<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="podbean/3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The King of Kings (1927)</title>
	<link>http://jesusfilms.podbean.com/2007/10/31/the-king-of-kings-1927/</link>
	<description>Jesus Films Podcast is an offshoot of the Bible Films Blog, providing a monthly podcast.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://podbean.com/?v=3.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: MattPage</title>
		<link>http://jesusfilms.podbean.com/2007/10/31/the-king-of-kings-1927/#comment-59850</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jesusfilms.podbean.com/2007/10/31/the-king-of-kings-1927/#comment-59850</guid>
					<description>Not entirely sure what caused the re-cut, but the re-release is simply criterion doing what they do best.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not entirely sure what caused the re-cut, but the re-release is simply criterion doing what they do best.</p>
<p>Matt
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin C. Neece</title>
		<link>http://jesusfilms.podbean.com/2007/10/31/the-king-of-kings-1927/#comment-58159</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jesusfilms.podbean.com/2007/10/31/the-king-of-kings-1927/#comment-58159</guid>
					<description>Well done as usual, sir! I'm currently sorting through the silent era, so this one was of particular interest. I think it's important to make a distinction between the 1927 and 1928 versions of this film. It's a shame, I think, that the 1928 version held sway for so long.

Do you know what the motivation was for doing the re-release? Also, what happened in 2004 to bring the original version back to light?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done as usual, sir! I&#8217;m currently sorting through the silent era, so this one was of particular interest. I think it&#8217;s important to make a distinction between the 1927 and 1928 versions of this film. It&#8217;s a shame, I think, that the 1928 version held sway for so long.</p>
<p>Do you know what the motivation was for doing the re-release? Also, what happened in 2004 to bring the original version back to light?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
